Microsoft word - recovery -schizophrenia - bipolar.doc
Is There a Psychopharmacology of Recovery from Schizophrenia? Medical parallel: treatment of complicated medical illness such as cancer requires clinician to be good strategist and good technician; same applies to complicated psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia Current challenges in treating severe mental illness: cure unlikely for most patients; -more medication choices than ever, -more chances to “get it right” -more chances to “get it wrong”; -controversy about degree to which newer medications can improve outcome; -newer antipsychotic medications still have burden of side effects different from that of older antipsychotics (eg, newer antipsychotics have reduced neurologic burden but increased metabolic burden) Treatment models in schizophrenia: -phase-of-illness model goal of keeping patient stable and avoiding relapse; -hierarchical model, -treatment progresses in linear fashion, from stabilizing patient to reducing burden of treatment and/or burden of disease to recovery (no consensus on what constitutes
recovery in schizophrenia; clinician, patient and family, and insurance company have differing definitions) Treatment goals in schizophrenia: remission—concept derived from treatment of affective disorders, in which it means patient has no symptoms; in schizophrenia, it means symptoms may be present but do not interfere with patient’s functioning or quality of life; recovery—defined by President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health as “process in which people are able to live, work, learn, and participate fully in their communities; for some individuals, recovery is the ability to live a fulfilling and productive life despite a disability”; ie, patient may experience symptoms but still lead full productive life Recovery model in schizophrenia: key assumptions -deterioration not inevitable - stability marks beginning, not end, of treatment; -goals are for achieving individual’s health rather than comparing him or her to others with persistent illness; -specific goals chosen by patient, not family or clinician Reasons recovery-oriented treatment realistic in schizophrenia: -ascendancy of neurodevelopmental model over neurodegenerative model;
-evidence for continued improvement over and above stabilization with newer medications; -evidence that psychosocial interventions can reduce persistent symptoms; -consistency of differences of side-effect profiles across antipsychotic treatment options Recovery-oriented approach to medication management: -patient sets goals and frustrations; -match frustrations with target symptom that can be treated and -work with patient to identify priority symptom to treat -advise patient not to stop medications -Persistent positive symptoms: optimize current medication regimen before changing medications; -anticholinergics attenuate response to antipsychotics; - -antidepressants delay or attenuate response to antipsychotics; -rule out nonpharmacologic causes of poor treatment response Cognition: news mixed; Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study showed that -newer antipsychotics have limited benefits on cognition,
relative to older antipsychotics; -anticholinergic estimated to account for ≈50% of cognitive dysfunction in patients taking anticholinergic; - -when asked which symptoms most frustrating, most patients say cognitive symptoms and affective symptoms trump positive symptoms and negative symptoms; -first consideration is not to make cognitive symptoms worse -Depression: newer antipsychotics better for attenuating comorbid depression; if depression continues, consider whether antidepressant or psychosocial intervention better adjunct, remembering that antidepressants can aggravate psychosis in some patients Adverse events and burden of treatment: theoretically, antipsychotic response can be achieved without side effects; difficult and requires good strategy; extrapyramidal side effects and sedation not necessary components of treatment; -assess level of distress and risks of treatment modalities New Treatment Options for Bipolar Disorder Monotherapy: in registration studies, in both mania and depression, antipsychotics provide 20% benefit (on average) over placebo; average number of medications in patients with bipolar disorder is 5 Divalproex (Depakote): monotherapy—studies found that “loading divalproex could be effective,” and loading strategy used in registration studies for divalproex extended release (ER); starting dosage 25 mg/kg per day, rounded up to nearest 500, then increased by another 500 mg on day 3; combination therapy— in American approach, foundational therapy is mood stabilizer (lithium or divalproex), with atypical antipsychotic added; in European approach, foundational therapy is antipsychotic, with mood stabilizer added; in European trial, valproate added to antipsychotic achieved extra benefit of 20% to 25% over antipsychotic monotherapy Carbamazepine (Tegretol): monotherapy—benefit ≈20% over placebo; starting dosage 400 mg/day in divided doses produced “fair bit of toxicity”; suggest that starting with 200 mg/day and increasing by 200 mg every other day decreases toxicity; carbamazepine lowers blood
levels of “almost everything” except maybe ziprasidone; combination therapy— in trial of acute mania where olanzapine (Zyprexa) or placebo added to carbamazepine, no additional benefit seen; in study where risperidone added to carbamazepine, 40% decrease in risperidone blood levels, and patients on carbamazepine had to be censored to see add-on risperidone separate from placebo and other mood stabilizers; carbamazepine should have no pharmacokinetic interaction with lithium, excreted renally, lithium, even olanzapine, failed to show additional benefit when added to carbamazepine Bipolar disorder: patients symptomatic about half the time, and depression more common than mood elevation; Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program (STEP) showed in depressed patients that adding antidepressant to mood stabilizer does not add much benefit over mood stabilizer alone, and mood stabilizer alone achieved only ≈25% response; with mood stabilizer as monotherapy in depressed patients, perhaps adding antidepressant later; if antidepressant does not work, try atypical antipsychotic
Pramipexole (Miramex): 2 trials show it may work as add-on, but only 22 patients total, and “there were some mood switches”; speaker starts with 0.125 mg at bedtime and increases every 4 days to 1.75 mg; “look out for nausea” Other add-ons: 1 trial showed 22% response rate to modafinil (Provigil), with 4.9% switch rate; gabapentin shown not to be effective as primary treatment for mania or for treatmentresistant rapid-cycling bipolar disorder, but may be useful in comorbid conditions such as anxiety or pain Lamotrigine: in trials, lamotrigine worked well in terms of response rate, but placebo worked well also; not indicated for acute bipolar depression or acute mania; may be effective in preventing recurrent depression; combination of lamotrigine and lithium may prevent depressive and manic episodes; in study, lamotrigine effective in treatment-resistant rapid cycling Topiramate Topomax): ineffective in acute mania, but patients lost weight; may be effective in treating comorbid disorders such as eating disorders, alcohol dependence, and migraine; can cause metabolic acidosis
Zonisamide (Zonegran): produced weight loss in obese people with no psychiatric disorder and in obese people with euthymic medicated bipolar disorder; long half life; cannot be used by patients with sulfonamide allergy; weight loss and tolerability adequate in one third of patients, intolerance in onethird, and it “just doesn’t work” one-third; metabolic acidosis can occur Oxcarbazepine (Trileptal): “data not too encouraging”; consider oxcarbazepine if patient has failed carbamazepine or is too unreliable to comply with blood testing associated with carbamazepine Atypical antipsychotics: all seem to work in mania; clozapine is only atypical antipsychotic not approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in bipolar mania; clozapine helpful if patient unable to sleep, but requires blood testing because of risk for agranulocytosis Risperidone: response ≈20% compared to placebo; if added to lithium or divalproex, additional benefit seen Olanzapine: response rate 20% to 25%; doses in trials 10 mg/day to 20 mg/day; in head-to-head trial with divalproex, olanzapine slightly better in efficacy, but divalproex slightly better in tolerability;
in head-to-head trial with lithium, olanzapine slightly better in relapsing mania, but associated with more weight gain than lithium Olanzapine plus fluoxetine combination: response “so-so” with 7.5 mg of olanzapine and 40 mg of fluoxetine per day; “if you absolutely have to use an antidepressant in bipolar depression and you want to do evidence-based medicine, this is what you would do”; in head-to-head trial with lamotrigine, combination had 9% response rate vs 7% weight gain Quetiapine (Sertoquel): response rate ≈17%; must be titrated to avoid hypotension Other atypical antipsychotics: ziprasidone (Geodon) and aripiprazole (Abilify), “we know [they] work in acute mania”; aripiprazole has maintenance indication; asenapine (Saphris)—separated from placebo on primary-outcome measure but not on response rate Emerging uses for atypical antipsychotics in bipolar disorder: primary therapies—olanzapine for mania, maintenance, and, when combined with fluoxetine, depression; risperidone, ziprasidone, and asenapine for mania;
quetiapine for mania and depression; aripiprazole for mania and maintenance; adjunctive therapies—olanzapine and risperidone for mania; quetiapine for mania and maintenance; clozapine for treatment resistance Conclusions: many new agents with diverse mechanistic efficacy and side-effect profiles in development; new anticonvulsants as class not effective in acute mania and have variable efficacy in bipolar disorders and comorbid conditions; newer antipsychotics as class effective in acute mania and show emerging efficacy in acute depression and maintenance
Kidney International, Vol. 67, Supplement 94 (2005), pp. S70–S74 Prevention of renal failure: The Malaysian experience LAI SEONG HOOI, HIN SENG WONG, and ZAKI MORAD Department of Medicine, Sultanah Aminah Hospital Johor Baru, Johor, Malaysia; and Department of Nephrology, Hospital KualaLumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Prevention of renal failure: The Malaysian experience. Re- the face of
Sildenafil Treatment of Women With Antidepressant-Associated Sexual Dysfunction A Randomized Controlled Trial Context Antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction is a common adverse effect that frequently results in premature medication treatment discontinuation and for whichno treatment has demonstrated efficacy in women. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of sildenafil for sexual dysf